Drawing for ISIGHT

USPTO serial 78048824

ISIGHT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ISIGHT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Tidwell

Mark Tidwell Haynes and Boone, LLP2323 Victory Avenue, Suite 700IP SectionDallas, UT 75219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for seismic data analysisACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2010ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 30, 2010REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 19, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 8, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 8, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 24, 2006EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Apr 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2006EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 28, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
May 2, 2005EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Mar 28, 2005EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Mar 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 26, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 22, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 16, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 29, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 9, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 9, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 30, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 4, 2002OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Oct 4, 2002OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Feb 8, 2002OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Oct 18, 2001ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 29, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 1, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance