USPTO serial 78048939
LEOTEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PHAM, LANA H
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LEOTEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Hart
ROBERT P HART THE LAW OFFICE OF ROBERT HART28 E JACKSON BLDG10TH FL STE H528CHICAGO, IL 60604Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer programs and software, namely for use in the execution, operation, compilation, and providing interoperability of software applications across operating systems; and the implementation of software supporting computer networks, namely, terminal servers and thin client applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Computer services, namely computer site design, computer diagnostic services, computer consultation, updating of computer software for others, and the leasing of computers and software | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Leotel Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Leotel Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named LEOTEL
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 29, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 30, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 10, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |