USPTO serial 78049119
SMALL FRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3275974Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 7, 2007
- Examiner
- EVANKO, PATRICIA MALESARDI
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SMALL FRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alpharetta, GA
Alpharetta, GA
Alpharetta, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lee B. Beitchman
LEE B BEITCHMAN BEITCHMAN & HUDSON215 14TH ST NWATLANTA, GA 30318UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food for infants | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2007 |
| 016 | Baby and children's books of all types, calendars, sheet music, photo and scrapbook albums, gift wrap, greeting cards, art and craft paint kits, markers, crayons, pens, pencils, stickers, rubber stamps, stamp pads, stationary, craft paper, pencil boxes and printed teaching materials in the areas of intellectual and creative development for children, all related to the subject matter of prerecorded videotapes, audio cassettes, digital video discs and compact discs featuring live and animated educational materials intended to develop and improve the creative and intellectual faculties of infants and children | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2007 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 14, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 21, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 4, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 13, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 16, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 29, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 22, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 9, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | CNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 1, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 14, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 9, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |