USPTO serial 78049575
BORGHESE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHARPER JR, SAM
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BORGHESE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen L. Baker
Stephen L. Baker BAKER AND RANNELLS PA575 ROUTE 28SUITE 102RARITAN, NJ 08869Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Consultation in the field of cosmetics, fashion and apparel; and beauty salon/health spas featuring hair care, hair styling, skin care, facials, body wraps and nail treatments | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 9, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2008 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 1, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 18, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 28, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 26, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 5, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 4, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 1, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 27, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |