USPTO serial 78049687
MASTERCARD MOBILE CURRENCY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MASTERCARD MOBILE CURRENCY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | FINANCIAL SERVICES, NAMELY BANKING AND CREDIT SERVICES; PROVIDING CREDIT CARD SERVICES IN THE NATURE OF CHARGE CARDS, DEBIT CARD AND STORED VALUE PREPAID PURCHASE CARD SERVICES, NAMELY, PROCESSING PAYMENTS MADE THROUGH PREPAID CARDS; CREDIT AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY PROVIDING CREDIT, DEBIT AND OTHER PAYMENT ACCOUNTS WITHOUT A PHYSICAL PAYMENT CARD, STORED VALUE PREPAID PURCHASE CARD SERVICES ALSO CALLED ELECTRONIC PURSE SERVICES NAMELY, PROCESSING PAYMENTS MADE THROUGH PREPAID CARDS; PROVIDING ELECTRONIC FUNDS SERVICES AND CURRENCY EXCHANGE SERVICES; ELECTRONIC PAYMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, ELECTRONIC PROCESSING AND TRANSMISSION OF BILL PAYMENT DATA; PREPAID TELEPHONE CALLING CARD SERVICES; ELECTRONIC CASH TRANSACTIONS, AND CREDIT CARD TRANSACTION PROCESSING AND VERIFICATION SERVICES; PROVIDING DEBT RECOVER AND COLLECTION SERVICES BY MEANS OF RADIO FREQUENCY IDENTIFICATION DEVICES IN THE NATURE OF TRANSPONDERS; TRAVEL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING SERVICES; CHECK VERIFICATION SERVICES; CREDIT AGENCY SERVICES, NAMELY ISSUING AND REDEMPTION SERVICES ALL RELATING TO TRAVELERS CHEQUES AND TRAVEL VOUCHERS; FINANCIAL CONSULTATION SERVICES RELATING TO ALL THE AFORESAID SERVICES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 9, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 4, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 12, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2003 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 6, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 23, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 2, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |