USPTO serial 78050191
DOUBLEU
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DOUBLEU?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATESTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Socks and stockings for men, women and children; clothing, namely, children's suits, dress, coats, jackets, skirts, pants, shirts, blouses, sweaters, vests, t-shirts, bodices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 22, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 21, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 12, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 8, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 26, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 16, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |