USPTO serial 78050239
PET ANTI AGING WELLNESS SYSTEM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 30, 2002
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PET ANTI AGING WELLNESS SYSTEM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Los Angeles, CA
Los Angeles, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARCIA A. AUBERGER
MARCIA A AUBERGER VENABLE, BAETJER, HOWARD & CIVILETTI1201 NEW YORK AVE NWSTE 1000WASHINGTON, DC 20005Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | VETERINARY PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS FOR CANINES, NAMELY, VETERINARY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS, VITAMINS, ANTI-OXIDANTS, MINERALS, PHYTO-NUTRIENTS, NUTRICEUTICALS, IMMUNE SYSTEM STIMULANTS AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2009 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 30, 2002 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jun 3, 2002 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 3, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 8, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2001 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 25, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |