Drawing for THERA-PRO

USPTO serial 78050250

THERA-PRO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with THERA-PRO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary-Ellen M. Devlin

MARY-ELLEN M DEVLIN BOEHRINGER INGELHEIM CORPORATION900 RIDGEBURY RDRIDGEFIELD, CT 06877UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Implantable medical device for use in the treatment of metabolic diseases such as diabetes, which device is capable of secreting chemicals such as proteins into the organism where such device is implantedACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 27, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 6, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Sep 29, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Sep 29, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 6, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Apr 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS
Mar 25, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 25, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 23, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Oct 9, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Oct 1, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Oct 1, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 14, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Mar 28, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Mar 28, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 1, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 9, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 19, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Mar 10, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 28, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 2, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 25, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance