Drawing for ADVANTAGE FAST FRIENDS

USPTO serial 78051716

ADVANTAGE FAST FRIENDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BERK, STEVEN R
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ADVANTAGE FAST FRIENDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Fred Carl III

FRED CARL III BAYER CORPORATION100 BAYER RDPITTSBURGH, PA 15205-9741UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed publications, namely brochures, pamphlets, newsletters, leaflets and magazines in the fields of pet care, pet health care, pet health and pet ownershipACTIVE—
041Educational services, namely conducting programs and seminars featuring instruction in the field of pet adoption, pet care, pet health care, pet health and pet ownership, and providing educational information in relation theretoACTIVE—
042Pet consultation services in the fields of pet adoption, pet care, pet health care, pet health and pet ownership; pet adoption servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 9, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 9, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 26, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 26, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 26, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 18, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 17, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 24, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 10, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 10, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 26, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 3, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance