Drawing for TICKLE

USPTO serial 78051724

TICKLE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OSBORNE, STANLEY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TICKLE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen Chesnoff

STEPHEN CHESNOFF SHACK SIEGEL KATZ FLAHERTY& GOODMAN PC530 FIFTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10036

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Antiperspirant and personal deodorantACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 3, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 3, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
May 20, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 10, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 6, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Jan 23, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Jan 23, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 7, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Nov 27, 2003EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Nov 26, 2003EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 17, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 16, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Nov 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 7, 2002EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Oct 3, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2002EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 26, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 26, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 27, 2001NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 4, 2001PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 15, 2001NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 10, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance