USPTO serial 78051957
SPRING PLUS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPRING PLUS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamin compounds; mineral preparations; vitamin and mineral preparations; herbal preparations; nutritional and dietary supplements; nutritional and dietary food supplements; dietary and herbal supplements; vitamins, multi-vitamins; standardized herbal extracts and neutraceuticals for the treatment of acne, addictions, aging, allergies, Alzheimer's disease, anemia, angina, antioxidant, anxiety, arthritic pain, asthma, athletes foot- fungus, bloating, blood pressure, breast health, bruises, bursitis/tendonitis, candida - yeast infection, carpal tunnel syndrome, cataracts, cellulite, elevated cholesterol, circulation problems, colds, constipation, coughs, dementia, depression, diabetes, diarrhea, digestion, dry skin, erectile dysfunction, eyesight failing, fatigue, flu, gas, hair health, hair loss, headaches, hearing loss, heart burn, heart problems, hot flashes, immunity, impotence, indigestion, infection, inflammation, insomnia, joint pain, lactose intolerance, learning difficulties, low energy, memory problems, menopause symptoms, muscle strain, nails and skin diseases, nausea, nervousness, osteoporosis, overweight, pain, PMS, prostate, psoriasis, senility, stiffness, stress, sugar metabolism, thyroid function, toxicity/detox, ulcers, stomach/duodenal, underweight, urinary difficulties, varicose veins, weight management; probiotics, namely, acidophilus and bifidus with goat's milk, mega acidophilus, multi acidophilus; amino acid compounds supplements; sports nutrition supplements; antioxidant food supplements; cosmeceuticals, namely, herbal lotions, creams and oils, medicinal herbal lotions, creams and oils | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 20, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 19, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 1, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 9, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |