CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for FRESH FROZEN

USPTO serial 78051980

FRESH FROZEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3185430Status 800Renewal
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 19, 2006
Examiner
BELENKER, ESTHER
Law office
—

What this means

This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with FRESH FROZEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*

Plus Government fees of $650

Trademark Monitoring(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert L. Brewer

Robert L. Brewer BASS, BERRY & SIMS PLC21 Platform Way South, Suite 3500Nashville, TN 37203United States

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Frozen vegetables, frozen fruits, frozen processed French fries [ and frozen chicken ]ACTIVEJan 1, 1981
030[ Frozen bread products, namely, [frozen breads] and biscuits ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2026NP89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF PARTIAL SEC. 8 & 9 EMAILED—
Mar 18, 2026RNL2REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Mar 18, 20269G8PREGISTERED - SEC. 9 GRANTED/CHECK RECORD FOR SEC. 8—
Mar 18, 20268PRTREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED—
Mar 18, 2026APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Jan 2, 2026E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2025REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Mar 28, 2025TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 28, 2025ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2025REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Aug 23, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2021EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Aug 23, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 23, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 23, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
May 22, 2017ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 22, 2017REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 31, 2017NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Mar 31, 2017NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Mar 29, 2017ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 13, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Feb 13, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Feb 13, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Dec 12, 2016E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
May 25, 2016ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2016REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2015REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 25, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Jan 29, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 13, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 22, 2012NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Aug 22, 2012C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Aug 22, 2012APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 3, 2012E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2012NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
May 7, 2012NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
May 2, 2012NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Apr 24, 2012NOSUNOTICE OF SUIT—
Dec 19, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Nov 1, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Sep 29, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Aug 30, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 10, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 21, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Apr 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 8, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 8, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 29, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Mar 28, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 25, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 18, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 8, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 8, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 3, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 4, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 16, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 16, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Oct 29, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 15, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 26, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jul 9, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance