USPTO serial 78052076
F1 DIODE LASER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with F1 DIODE LASER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Montreal, Quebec, CA
MONTREAL, QC., CA
PQC - QUEBEC, CA
PQC - QUEBEC, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN LAW ASSOCIATES PC80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562-5615UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical apparatus and instruments, namely-- high power laser mobile unit provided with an aiming beam for the removal of unwanted hair which is distributed and sold directly by the applicant or through authorized distributors; software, namely-- a computer program used by the laser mobile unit's operator to interact with such laser mobile unit; manuals and documentation for use and promotion of such laser mobile unit and such computer program sold in connection therewith | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Derma Laser Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by OPUSMED INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OPUS MEDICAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OPUS MEDICAL INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named F1 DIODE LASER
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 3, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2006 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2006 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 23, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2005 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 19, 2005 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 20, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 24, 2004 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 2, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 12, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 10, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |