Drawing for VARIQUEST

USPTO serial 78052263

VARIQUEST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with VARIQUEST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JENNIFER A. VAN KIRK

JENNIFER A VAN KIRK LEWIS AND ROCA LLP40 N CENTRAL AVEPHOENIX, AZ 85004-4424UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATABASE MANAGEMENT, WEB SITE DEVELOPMENT, WEB SITE CONTENT MANAGEMENT, ASSET TRACKING AND MANAGEMENT, TIMEKEEPING AND BILLINGACTIVEJan 31, 2001
037MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE; INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; COMPUTER INSTALLATION AND REPAIRACTIVEJan 31, 2001
041COMPUTER EDUCATION TRAINING SERVICESACTIVEJan 31, 2001
042COMPUTER CONSULTATION; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING NETWORK WEB PAGES FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY CREATING AND MAINTAINING WEBSITES FOR OTHERS; HOSTING WEBSITES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER FOR A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; INSTALLATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MAINTENANCE OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE; PRINTING AND GRAPHIC ART DESIGNACTIVEJan 31, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 29, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Aug 29, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 29, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 17, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 30, 2003GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 30, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 29, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 29, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 24, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 24, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Mar 24, 2003EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Mar 24, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 24, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 2, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 12, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 8, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 23, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance