USPTO serial 78052297
SPRING NATURALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SPRING NATURALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
B. Edward Shlesinger, Jr.
RONG ZHANG1550 UNITED BLVDCOQUITLAM, BC V3K 6Y7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Vitamin compounds; mineral supplements; vitamin and mineral supplements; herbal supplements; nutritional and dietary supplements; nutritional and dietary food supplements; dietary and herbal supplements; vitamins, multi-vitamins; Nutriceuticals for use as a dietary supplement; pharmaceuticals and nutriceutical probiotic preparations for treatment of microbial and fungal infections; amino acid supplements; nutritional supplements in the nature of antioxidant's; cosmeceuticals, namely, herbal lotions, creams and oils, medicinal herbal lotions, creams and oils; dietary food supplements; food for diabetics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 10, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 8, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 8, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 8, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 19, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 14, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 9, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 1, 2004 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 3, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2003 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |