Drawing for TENNIS NETWORK

USPTO serial 78052625

TENNIS NETWORK

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TENNIS NETWORK?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP) FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR USE IN CONTENT MANAGEMENT OF WEB SITES IN THE FIELD OF TENNIS INFORMATION, GOODS AND SERVICES; APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER (ASP), NAMELY, HOSTING COMPUTER SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS OF OTHERS; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, DESIGNING, CREATING, HOSTING, MAINTAINING, OPERATING AND MANAGING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; HOSTING OF DIGITAL CONTENT ON THE INTERNET; DISPLAYING THE WEB SITES AND IMAGES OF OTHERS ON A COMPUTER SERVER; COMPUTER GRAPHICS SERVICES; DATA CONVERSION OF COMPUTER PROGRAM DATA OR INFORMATION; COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, CREATING INDEXES OF INFORMATION, SITES AND OTHER RESOURCES AVAILABLE ON COMPUTER NETWORKS; PROVIDING SEARCH ENGINES FOR OBTAINING DATA ON A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK; COMPUTER CONSULTATION, NAMELY, PROVIDING TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE IN THE FIELD OF DESIGNING, CREATING, HOSTING, MAINTAINING, OPERATING AND MANAGING WEB SITESACTIVEJan 10, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 10, 2006MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 6, 2006ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Oct 5, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 6, 2006EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 11, 2005GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 11, 2005CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Nov 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 13, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 19, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 14, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 14, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 13, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 13, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 13, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 13, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 13, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 12, 2003EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 8, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 26, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Apr 14, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 2, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 31, 2002GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 19, 2002GAUDNOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED—
Jun 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 4, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
May 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance