Drawing for AETHER FUSION

USPTO serial 78053032

AETHER FUSION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GASKINS, TONJA M
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AETHER FUSION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kris Keeney

KRIS R KEENEY KRIS R KEENEY PC DIGITALAW4510 COX RD STE 109GLEN ALLEN, VA 23060UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042HOUSE MARK FOR SERVICES IN THE DESIGN OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR OTHERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 10, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 6, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 25, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 28, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Sep 22, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 19, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 19, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 19, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 25, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 25, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 23, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 28, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 29, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Feb 4, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Nov 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 8, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 30, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 30, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 2, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance