USPTO serial 78053133
MIRACLE MONKEY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MIRACLE MONKEY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beverly Hills, CA
Beverly Hills, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Katherine L. McDaniel, Esq.
KATHERINE L MCDANIEL ESQ KATTEN MUCHIN ZAVIS1999 AVE OF THE STARS STE 1400LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-6047UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | ELECTRICAL AND SCIENTIFIC APPARATUS, NAMELY, COMPUTER GAMES SOFTWARE, COMPUTER GAMES CARTRIDGES, COMPUTER GAMES APPARATUS AND INSTRUMENTS, NAMELY, CD ROMS, DVDS, COMPUTER DISCS, COMPUTER GAME CASSETTES, COMPUTER GAME TAPES, COMPUTER GAME DISCS, MOTION PICTURE FILMS FEATURING ANIMATED CARTOONS AND ANIMATED FILMS, COMPACT DISCS FEATURING ANIMATED CARTOONS AND ANIMATED FILMS, PRERECORDED AUDIO TAPES FEATURING MUSICAL SOUND RECORDINGS AND SOUNDTRACKS OF ANIMATED CARTOONS AND ANIMATED FILMS, PRERECORDED VIDEO TAPES FEATURING ANIMATED CARTOONS AND ANIMATED FILMS, PRERECORDED VIDEO CASSETTES FEATURING CHILDREN'S ANIMATION, PRERECORDED DVD FEATURING CHILDREN'S ANIMATION, VIDEO GAMES SOFTWARE, VIDEO GAMES CARTRIDGES, VIDEO GAME CASSETTES, VIDEO GAME TAPES, VIDEO GAME DISCS, MULTIMEDIA SOFTWARE RECORDED ON CD-ROM CONSISTING OF INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT SOFTWARE, VIDEO TAPES FEATURING ANIMATED CARTOONS AND ANIMATED FILMS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 6, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 3, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 2, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |