USPTO serial 78053634
IT'S EASIER TO DESTROY THAN TO BUILD...WE PROTECT WHAT YOU BUILD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FAIRBANKS, RONALD L
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IT'S EASIER TO DESTROY THAN TO BUILD...WE PROTECT WHAT YOU BUILD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
James E. O'Connor
JAMES E O'CONNOR BAIRD HOLM MCEACHEN PEDERSEN, ET AL1500 WOODMEN TWROMAHA, NE 68102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software applications for direct use or use in a service bureau environment, namely, computer software programs used to provide for computer network, system and application security assessments and analysis; computer software programs used for computer network, system and application security protection and security management; computer software for monitoring data communications on computer networks and systems; computer software used for surveillance of computer networks' and systems' user traffic; computer software used to protect the privacy of data communications and transactions conducted on computer networks and systems; computer software used for computer network, system and application intrusion detection, disablement, alerts and response; and computer software used for the management of secure computer networks, systems and applications; and computer software programs which monitor and assist companies with virus detection and removal and encryption and authentication of data | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Solutionary, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Solutionary, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Similar marks named IT'S EASIER TO DESTROY THAN TO BUILD...WE PROTECT WHAT YOU BUILD
- Prosecution event ABN6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 2, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 9, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 16, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 9, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |