Drawing for HOWLER

USPTO serial 78053818

HOWLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MILTON, PRISCILLA
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HOWLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Janet A. Kobrin

JANET A KOBRIN WARNER BROSWARNER4000 WARNER BLVDBURBANK, CA 91522-0002

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing for men, women and children, namely, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, jogging suits, trousers, pants, shorts, tank tops, rainwear, cloth bibs, skirts, blouses, dresses, suspenders, sweaters, jackets, coats, raincoats, snow suits, ties, robes, hats, caps, sunvisors, belts, scarves, sleepwear, pajamas, lingerie, underwear, boots, shoes, sneakers, sandals, booties, slipper socks, swimwear and masquerade and Halloween costumes and masks sold in connection therewithACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 30, 2003ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 2, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 2, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 21, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 21, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 20, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 30, 2001CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 24, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance