Drawing for LOOPZERO

USPTO serial 78054073

LOOPZERO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOOPZERO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John P. Courtney

JOHN P COURTNEY ANDREWS & KURTH LLP600 TRAVIS ST STE 4200HOUSTON, TX 77002-2910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunications gateway servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 25, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 25, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 21, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Mar 14, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Mar 14, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 29, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 18, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 18, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 18, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 24, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 4, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 11, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 23, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 8, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 20, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Mar 20, 2001AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance