USPTO serial 78054251
KRAFTTECH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SONNEBORN, TRICIA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KRAFTTECH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Dinard, FR
Dinard, FR
KWAI CHUNG, KOWLOON, HK
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey R. Gargano
JEFFREY R GARGANO MCDERMOTT WILL & EMERY LLP227 W MONROE STCHICAGO, IL 60606-5096UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | (Based on Intent to Use only) Measuring tools, namely, graduated rulers, micrometers, calipers, gauges, dial indicators, and measuring tapes; Inspection and magnetic tools, namely, inspection mirrors, magnetic claws, magnetic pick-up tools, magnetic bases, magnetic tool parts tray, and magnets; Electronic testing equipment, namely, electronic levels and guides for use by tradesmen; analog and digital multimeters, probes, thermometers, and circuit testers; Lighting and electrical equipment in the nature of thermostats, voltage regulators, extension electrical cords, converters and battery chargers; Electronic test equipment for automobiles, namely, diagnostic analyzers, timing lights, digital lights; Specialty testers for automobiles, namely, adapters, taps, clips, jumper wires, test leads, wire terminal removers, amperage and voltage testers, and short circuit finders; Pressure sensor testers for circuit charging, ignition, and cruise control, alternator/regulator systems of automobiles, and fuse testing and pulling; Vacuum leak detectors, and compression testers; Welders; Air conditioning tools and test equipment, namely, machines for recovery, recycling, reclaiming, charging and recharging of refrigerant, charging meters, electronic sight glass, leak detectors, and gauge sets; Antifreeze testers; Attenuators; Automatic nozzles and valves; Chronographs for use as specialized time recording apparatuses; Computers, scanners; printers and circuit boards; Diving related equipment, namely controllers for regulating air; Audio cassette, VCR, CD, and DVD recorders and players; Batteries; Cameras; Photographic film developing machines; Telephones; pressure regulators for controlling the supply of compressed gas; and parts and fittings for all the aforesaid goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 4, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 4, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 3, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 31, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 5, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 2, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 10, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 20, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 13, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 5, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 1, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 5, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 31, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 18, 2002 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 3, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2002 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 21, 2002 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |