Drawing for BLUERIDGE FROM BOYAR ESTATES

USPTO serial 78054440

BLUERIDGE FROM BOYAR ESTATES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - SLIE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BLUERIDGE FROM BOYAR ESTATES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Scott Evans

J SCOTT EVANS OR W THAD ADAMS III ADAMS SCHWARTZ & EVANS PA2180 TWO FIRST UNION CTRCHARLOTTE, NC 28282UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033Wines; WinesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 24, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 10, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 10, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 2, 2004EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Jun 14, 2004CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Apr 13, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 18, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 12, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 27, 2003CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 30, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 30, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 10, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 26, 20011.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Nov 26, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 9, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance