USPTO serial 78054673
MEDICAL MANICURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KOVALSKY, LAURA G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MEDICAL MANICURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Eugene E. Renz, Jr.
EUGENE E RENZ JR EUGENE E. RENZ, JR., PC205 N MONROE STPO BOX 2056MEDIA, PA 19063-9056Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | On-line retail services featuring products in the field of cosmetic care offered via a website | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 2003 |
| 041 | Educational services in the nature of seminars and workshops on the subject of a technique of fingernail and toenail care to optimize health of the nail, prevention of infection and prevention of skin and nail blood borne infections | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 2003 |
| 042 | Providing information on the subject of a technique of fingernail and toenail care by means of a global computer network | ACTIVE | Aug 6, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 22, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 23, 2004 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 6, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 7, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 20, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 8, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 9, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 27, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 30, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |