USPTO serial 78054931
AUTUMN NATURALS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BOULTON, KELLY F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AUTUMN NATURALS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | VITAMIN COMPOUNDS; MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS; VITAMIN AND MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS; HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS; NUTRITIONAL AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; DIETARY AND HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS; VITAMINS, MULTI-VITAMINS; NEUTRACEUTICALS; PHARMACEUTICALS AND NEUTRACEUTICAL PROBIOTIC PREPARATIONS FOR TREATMENT OF MICROBIAL AND FUNGAL INFECTIONS; AMINO ACID SUPPLEMENTS; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS IN THE NATURE OF ANTIOXIDANT'S; COSMECEUTICALS, NAMELY, MEDICINAL HERBAL LOTIONS, CREAMS AND OILS; DIETARY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS; FOOD FOR DIABETICS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 9, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 2, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 4, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 19, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2003 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Nov 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 27, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2002 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |