Drawing for WEDGWOOD GRAND GOURMET

USPTO serial 78054934

WEDGWOOD GRAND GOURMET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WEDGWOOD GRAND GOURMET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SEAN P. MERRILL

JAMIE J FITZGERALD WIGGIN AND DANA LLP265 CHURCH ST PO BOX 1832NEW HAVEN, CT 06508-1832UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
008FLATWARE AND CUTLERY, NAMELY FORKS, SPOONS, KNIVES, BUTTER KNIVES, FISH KNIVES FOR DINING, STEAK KNIVES, CARVING KNIVES, PARING KNIVES, SALAD FORKS, CARVING FORKS, RELISH FORKS, DESSERT SPOONS AND DESSERT FORKS; HAND TOOLS, NAMELY, ICE PICKS; NUT CRACKERS NOT OF PRECIOUS METALACTIVE—
021hollowware, namely, covered sugar bowls of non-precious metal, creamer pitchers, gravy boats, non-electric coffee pots not of precious metal, and teapots not of precious metal; basting spoons, serving spoons, salad servers, kitchen ladles, cake servers, carver rests, cocktail picks, cooking skewers, cork screws, corn cob holders, wine bottle cradles, wine bottle coasters made from non-precious metal, wood, cork or glass; coolers for wine, crumb brushes and trays, ice buckets, knife rests, pie servers, trivets, ice serving tongs, candle snuffers; cruet stands for oil or vinegars and napkin rings, both of non-precious metal, wood or glassACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 7, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 29, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
May 20, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 21, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 9, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 26, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 17, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 11, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 17, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 15, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 13, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 11, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance