USPTO serial 78055376
SOUPER BOWL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SOUPER BOWL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Garden Grove, CA
Garden Grove, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J. DAY
CHRISTOPHER J DAY LAW OFFICE OF CHRISTOPHER DAY340 E PALM LN STE 282PHOENIX, AZ 85004-4603UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Fastfood Restaurant serving variety Vietnamese noodle soups and other cultural cuisine | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 26, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 26, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 18, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 29, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 31, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |