USPTO serial 78055557
BIOSECURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- POWELL, STEVEN
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BIOSECURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Apple Valley, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Robert P. Schwartz
ROBERT P SCHWARTZ ROBERT P SCHWARTZ, ATTORNEY AT LAWWAYZATA5775 WAYZATA BLVD STE 700ST LOUIS PARK, MN 55416-1233Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Antimicrobial products, including hand lotion, disinfectants, cleaners, disposable non-woven fiber towels, and a spray coating for assisting the biosecurity programs of housing for beef cattle, birds, calves, cats, dairy cattle, dogs, horses, rabbits, swine, and turkeys and for use in food and food safety areas such as food processing plants, restaurants, and food services; feed additive for accelerating the digestion process of animals;silage inoculatants and/or bacteria used in the preservation of agricultural products; treatment of waste | ACTIVE | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 7, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 1, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |