USPTO serial 78055709
NEW BREED WIRELESS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BLOHM, LINDA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with NEW BREED WIRELESS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Charles E. Weinstein, Esquire
CHARLES E WEINSTEIN ESQ FOLEY, HOAG & ELIOT LLP1 POST OFFICE SQBOSTON, MA 02109-2106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational and entertainment services, namely, the production of on-line games, video shorts and web-cast programming for wireless transmission over the Internet and other computer networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cutting Edge Investor Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Cutting Edge Investor Group, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named NEW BREED WIRELESS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 12, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 9, 2001 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |