USPTO serial 78055777
LUCKY DOG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMAS, AMY E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUCKY DOG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BONNIE S. SPARKS
BONNIE S SPARKS NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANYINTELLECTUAL PROPERTY DEPTCHECKERBOARD SQ 11TSAINT LOUIS, MO 63164Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 031 | PET TREATS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ralston Purina Company
- Other trademarks owned by Ralston Purina Company
- Other trademarks owned by NESTLE PURINA PETCARE COMPANY
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named LUCKY DOG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 30, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 14, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 7, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 1, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 10, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2003 | LEXT | LATE FILED EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 21, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| May 30, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 10, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 14, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 1, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 21, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 26, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 25, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 4, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |