Drawing for ST@FY WWW.STAFY.NET

USPTO serial 78055856

ST@FY WWW.STAFY.NET

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SAPPENFIELD, ANN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ST@FY WWW.STAFY.NET?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven M. Rabin

STEVEN M RABIN RABIN & CHAMPAGNE, PC1101 14TH ST NW STE 500WASHINGTON, DC 20005-5633UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009recorded computer software, recorded computer operating programs, recorded computer programs, floppy disks, and CD-ROMs, all for use in connection with chatting services via a computer network; compact discs recorded with music; unformatted computer disks for audio or video use; remote control for radios, televisions and stereos; and apparatus for analyzing network operation for use in connection with chatting services via a computer network, namely, equipment for measuring traffic size, router operation, switch operation and link performanceACTIVE—
035auctioneering; import-export agencies, retail store services featuring computer programs; online ordering services featuring computer programs; commercial information agencies; advertising planning consultation, advertising agencies, advertising design for others; economic forecasting; business information agencies; procurement of computer programs for othersACTIVE—
042news reporting services; recovery of computer data; rental of computer software; computer software design for others; updating of computer software for others; maintenance of computer software; computer system analysis; computer programming for othersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 24, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 13, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 10, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 27, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 18, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 26, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 26, 2002GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Oct 10, 2002PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 27, 2002PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 27, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2002ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 7, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 21, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance