USPTO serial 78056234
EYETECH INC.
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 29, 2005
- Examiner
- WOOD, CAROLINE
- Law office
- —
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with EYETECH INC.?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
NEW YORK, NY
New York, NY
New York, NY
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
New York, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Christopher L. Graff
Christopher L. Graff PIRKEY BARBER PLLC600 Congress Avenue, Suite 2120Austin, TX 78701UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Ocular pharmaceuticals, namely pharmaceutical preparations containing a nucleic acid or an antibody for the treatment of ocular diseases, namely, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic macular edema, and other retinal diseases in the back of the eye | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 13, 2004 |
| 010 | Delivery devices for delivering ocular pharmaceutical preparations to a subject | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 13, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by (OSI) EYETECH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by EYETECH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Eyetech Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named EYETECH INC.
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Aug 8, 2012 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 8, 2012 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Aug 6, 2010 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 5, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 5, 2010 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2010 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 30, 2010 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jun 28, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 11, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| May 11, 2010 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 11, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2010 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 15, 2008 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 29, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 28, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 28, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 14, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 21, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 22, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 30, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 10, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 13, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 13, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 8, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |