USPTO serial 78056477
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | VITAMIN COMPOUNDS; MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS; VITAMIN AND MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS; HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS; NUTRITIONAL AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; NUTRITIONAL AND DIETARY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS; DIETARY AND HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS; VITAMINS, MULTI-VITAMINS; NEUTRACEUTICALS; PHARMACEUTICALS AND NETRICEUTICAL PROBIOTIC PREPARATIONS FOR TREATMENT OF MICROBIAL AND FUNGAL INFECTIONS; AMINO ACID SUPPLEMENTS; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS IN THE NATURE OF ANTIOXIDANT'S; COSMECEUTICALS, NAMELY, HERBAL LOTIONS, CREAMS AND OILS, MEDICINAL HERBAL LOTIONS, CREAMS AND OILS; DIETARY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS; FOOD FOR DIABETICS | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 9, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 1, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 31, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 16, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 30, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 12, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 15, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 13, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |