Drawing for SPRING TIME

USPTO serial 78056477

SPRING TIME

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with SPRING TIME?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005VITAMIN COMPOUNDS; MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS; VITAMIN AND MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS; HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS; NUTRITIONAL AND DIETARY SUPPLEMENTS; NUTRITIONAL AND DIETARY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS; DIETARY AND HERBAL SUPPLEMENTS; VITAMINS, MULTI-VITAMINS; NEUTRACEUTICALS; PHARMACEUTICALS AND NETRICEUTICAL PROBIOTIC PREPARATIONS FOR TREATMENT OF MICROBIAL AND FUNGAL INFECTIONS; AMINO ACID SUPPLEMENTS; NUTRITIONAL SUPPLEMENTS IN THE NATURE OF ANTIOXIDANT'S; COSMECEUTICALS, NAMELY, HERBAL LOTIONS, CREAMS AND OILS, MEDICINAL HERBAL LOTIONS, CREAMS AND OILS; DIETARY FOOD SUPPLEMENTS; FOOD FOR DIABETICSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 9, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 1, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 31, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Feb 3, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 30, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 21, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 21, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 16, 2004RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 30, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 30, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 30, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Dec 22, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 12, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 2, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
May 23, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 7, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance