USPTO serial 78056565
HEAVY HITTERS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 1, 2005
- Examiner
- ELTON, DAVID JONATHAN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
Need help with HEAVY HITTERS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Washington, DC, US
Washington, DC, US
Fort Lauderdale, FL, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel S. Polley
Daniel S. Polley Daniel S. Polley, P.A.8185 Via Ancho Road#880148Boca Raton, FL 33488Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Legal services | ACTIVE | Jan 5, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 2026 | NURC | NOTICE OF UPDATED REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 5, 2026 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2026 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Mar 12, 2026 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 5, 2026 | PRAM | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 7 | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 8, 2026 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 30, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 21, 2020 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 20, 2020 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Nov 25, 2015 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2015 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 24, 2015 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jul 20, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jul 20, 2015 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 6, 2015 | EROP | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | PR89 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 9 | — |
| Feb 9, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | 89AF | REGISTERED - COMBINED SECTION 8 (10-YR) & SEC. 9 FILED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 28, 2015 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | NA15 | SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | 15AK | REGISTERED - SEC. 15 ACKNOWLEDGED | — |
| Aug 31, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 24, 2011 | E15R | TEAS SECTION 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jul 12, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | NOSU | NOTICE OF SUIT | — |
| Aug 15, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 15, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Dec 4, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 20, 2003 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 30, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 18, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 5, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 21, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2002 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 5, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 5, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 21, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 2, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 1, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |