USPTO serial 78056941
SC VELOCITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KRISP, JENNIFER MARIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SC VELOCITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jason A. Bernstein
JASON A BERNSTEIN POWELL, GOLDSTEIN, FRAZER & MURPHY LLP191 PEACHTREE ST NE 16TH FLATLANTA, GA 30303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT, NAMELY, LOGISTICS, FULFILLMENT, DISTRIBUTION CENTER OPERATIONS, AND ANALYZING THE INSIDE, INCOMING, OUTSIDE AND OUTGOING DISTRIBUTION AND MOVEMENT OF GOODS, SERVICES AND INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2004 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 13, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 27, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 9, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |