Drawing for SASI

USPTO serial 78058541

SASI

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 2832989Status 713
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 13, 2004
Examiner
CAIN, CATHERINE P
Law office
TTAB

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SASI?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Ray Mantle

CRAIG J ALBERT REITLER BROWN & ROSENBLATT LLC800 3RD AVE 21ST FLNEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial management, investment management, and fund management services, namely, facilitating the creation and growth of seed and early-stage technology companies, investing the funds of others, and assisting portfolio companies with financial servicesSECTION 18 - CANCELLEDMar 16, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 15, 2005C18.CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL—
Mar 15, 2005CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jan 27, 2005CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Dec 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2004CANGCANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999—
Jul 1, 2004PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Apr 13, 2004R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Feb 3, 2004CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
Feb 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Oct 10, 2003PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Oct 8, 2003PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Oct 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 10, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Sep 10, 2003FAXXFAX SENT—
Jul 23, 2003SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jun 23, 2003IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Jun 23, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 24, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 27, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 27, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 27, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 4, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 15, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 13, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 11, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 11, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 8, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 6, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 1, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance