USPTO serial 78058973
ANSWERPOINT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOLTZ, ALLISON
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ANSWERPOINT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael C. Mason
MICHAEL C MASON KING & SPALDING191 PEACHTREE STATLANTA, GA 30303-1763UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | APPLICATION SERVICE PROVIDER FEATURING SOFTWARE FOR ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT IN THE HEALTH CARE INDUSTRY; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; CONSULTING SERVICES IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER PROGRAMMING IN THE AREA OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SOFTWARE DESIGN IN THE AREA OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT FOR OTHERS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; COMPUTER SYSTEMS ANALYSIS IN THE AREA OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT; INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS;INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS IN THE AREA OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT; RECOVERING COMPUTER DATA FOR OTHERS; RECOVERING COMPUTER DATA IN THE AREA OF ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE MANAGEMENT FOR OTHERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 14, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 17, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Aug 27, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |