USPTO serial 78059517
SANDBRIDGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2978118Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 26, 2005
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SANDBRIDGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN DIEGO, CA
Vienna, VA
White Plains, NY
White Plains, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph D. Lewis
JOSEPH D LEWIS BARNES & THORNBURG750 17TH ST NW STE 900WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | integrated circuits, semiconductor devices, encoded integrated circuit cards containing programming for digital signal processing and telecommunications applications and circuit boards for communications applications and, data sheets, data books, and reference manuals provided therewith; computer software for digital signal processing and signal communications | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2003 |
| 042 | integrated circuit design and engineering services, namely, the design and development of application specific integrated circuit products for others; computer programming in the field of digital signal processing | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 31, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by ASPEN ACQUISITION CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by Sandbridge Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sandbridge Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Sandbridge Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named SANDBRIDGE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 2, 2012 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 18, 2005 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2005 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2005 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Feb 19, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 23, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 3, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 1, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |