USPTO serial 78059533
ECONTENTPACKAGER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ECONTENTPACKAGER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Erin S. Hennessy
ERIN S HENNESSY TIME WARNER INC14TH FLONE TIME WARNER CTRNEW YORK, NY 10019Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for network management and control over secure information distribution on global computer information networks and on local computer networks in secure data access and distribution | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | computer services in the management and control over secure information distribution on global computer information networks and on local computer networks, computer services in secure data access and distribution, computer services in computer network management | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 27, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 21, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 16, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 14, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |