USPTO serial 78059702
EUPHONIC AUDIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EUPHONIC AUDIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
PRINCETON JUNCTION, NJ
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JAY FLEMMA
JAY FLEMMA RONALD S BIENSTOCK & ASSOCIATES PC250 W 57TH ST STE 1917NEW YORK, NY 10107UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | MUSICAL INSTRUMENT AMPLIFIERS AND COMPONENTS THEREFORE, NAMELY, AUDIO SPEAKERS, SPEAKER CABINETS, SPEAKER ENCLOSURES, SOUND AMPLIFIERS, PRE-AMPLIFIERS, SOUND PROCESSORS AND MODIFIERS, NAMELY DELAY, REVERB AND DISTORTION EFFECTS BOXES, BOTH FOOT OPERATED AND SPEAKER HEAD MOUNTED UNITS. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 14, 2003 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 30, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 4, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 30, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |