Drawing for ANYTIME, ANYWHERE STORAGE

USPTO serial 78059780

ANYTIME, ANYWHERE STORAGE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ANYTIME, ANYWHERE STORAGE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carol H. Peters

CAROL H PETERS MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRISGLOVSKY & POPEP PCONE FINANCIAL CTRBOSTON, MA 02111

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer Software and/or hardware used in electronic data management or for use in accessing electronic file systems or for accessing electronic storageACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 22, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 22, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 12, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 17, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Mar 23, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 23, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Sep 29, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Sep 14, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Sep 14, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Aug 24, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 7, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Aug 7, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 5, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 26, 2004PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Mar 22, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Mar 17, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 18, 2004PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 15, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Dec 30, 2003PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Oct 15, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 8, 2003PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Aug 8, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 14, 2003ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 9, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 17, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 17, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 25, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 5, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 23, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 13, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Feb 12, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 1, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 4, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance