USPTO serial 78059887
JOE BLASCO HOLLYWOOD SCHOOL OF MAKE-UP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Apr 20, 2004
- Examiner
- GARTNER, JOHN M
- Law office
- SCANNING ON DEMAND
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with JOE BLASCO HOLLYWOOD SCHOOL OF MAKE-UP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda D. Schoonover
Linda D. Schoonover Linda D. Schoonover, P.ASuite 10411301 S. International ParkwayLake Mary, FL 32746Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Educational service, namely, conducting classes, seminars, conferences, workshops in the field of the technique and application of cosmetics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Blasco, Joseph D.
- Other trademarks owned by Blasco, Joseph D.
- Other trademarks owned by Blasco, Joseph D.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named JOE BLASCO HOLLYWOOD SCHOOL OF MAKE-UP
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2010 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 20, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 24, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 19, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 28, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 28, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |