USPTO serial 78060053
BLOOMBERG LEGAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FERRAIUOLO, DOMINIC
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BLOOMBERG LEGAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph N. Zarro
COURTENAY C SEABRING WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER LLP787 7TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019-6099UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | BUSINESS NEWS AND INFORMATION SERVICES, NAMELY COLLECTING AND PROVIDING BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL, DEMOGRAPHIC, ECONOMIC, MARKETING, SALES, ADVERTISING, TAX, ACCOUNTING, CREDIT RATING AND PERSONNEL DATA, REPORTS AND INFORMATION; BUSINESS, ECONOMIC AND MARKET RESEARCH SERVICES; COMPUTERIZED DATABASE MANAGEMENT AND INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL SERVICES; PROMOTING THE GOODS AND SERVICES OF OTHERS BY DISSEMINATING ADVERTISEMENTS OVER, BY OR THROUGH LOCAL OR WIDE AREA COMPUTER NETWORKS, WIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS, GLOBAL COMPUTER INFORMATION NETWORKS AND OTHER ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATION NETWORKS; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING BUSINESS CONFERENCES; ARRANGING AND CONDUCTING TRADE SHOWS IN THE FIELDS OF NEWS, RESEARCH, COMPUTERIZED DATABASES AND OTHER INDEXES OF INFORMATION, LAW, GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC RECORDS, BUSINESS, FINANCE, SECURITIES, SECURITIES MARKETS, POLITICS, CURRENT EVENTS, ENTERTAINMENT, SPORTS, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, HEALTH, TRAVEL, HUMAN INTEREST STORIES AND THE ENERGY AND ASPHALT INDUSTRIES; PROVIDING A DIRECTORY OF INFORMATION IN THE FIELD OF LAWYERS AND LEGAL SERVICES; PROVIDING AN ON-LINE COMPUTER DATABASE IN THE FIELDS OF BUSINESS, MANAGEMENT, FINANCIAL, DEMOGRAPHIC, ECONOMIC, MARKETING, SALES, ADVERTISING, TAX, ACCOUNTING, CREDIT RATING AND PERSONNEL DATA, REPORTS AND INFORMATION | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 29, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 13, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 21, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2004 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 21, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 9, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 10, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |