USPTO serial 78060089
BLASCO SPECIAL MAKE-UP ACADEMY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 7, 2004
- Examiner
- TAYLOR, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLASCO SPECIAL MAKE-UP ACADEMY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Linda D. Schoonover, Esq.
Linda D. Schoonover Linda D. Schoonover, P.ASuite 10411301 S. International ParkwayLake Mary, FL 32746Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing courses of instruction as to technique and application of cosmetics | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 1, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 8, 2011 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 27, 2010 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 7, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 24, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 19, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| May 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 30, 2004 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 31, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 13, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 30, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 13, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 31, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 8, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 18, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 20, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 25, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |