USPTO serial 78060125
TAPESTRY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BRECKENFELD, WILLIAM G
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TAPESTRY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Beach Road Development Company, LLC
Bonita Springs, FL
Other trademarks owned by Beach Road Development Company, LLC
RESOURCE CONSERVATION PROPERTIES, INC.
BONITA SPRINGS, FL
Other trademarks owned by RESOURCE CONSERVATION PROPERTIES, INC.
Beach Road Development Company, LLC
Bonita Springs, FL
Other trademarks owned by Beach Road Development Company, LLC
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTA I BURGIN
MARTA I BURGIN ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLPONE METROPOLITAN SQ STE 2600ST LOUIS, MO 63102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate brokerage | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Beach Road Development Company, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by RESOURCE CONSERVATION PROPERTIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Beach Road Development Company, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named TAPESTRY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 3, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 3, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 7, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 26, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 3, 2003 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 6, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 25, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 22, 2002 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 27, 2001 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 4, 2001 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 15, 2001 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 23, 2001 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |