USPTO serial 78060279
OVALE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOSID, ROBIN S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OVALE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
JESS M. COLLEN
COLLEN IP INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAWTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG80 S HIGHLAND AVEOSSINING, NY 10562Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | (Based on Intent to Use) METAL BOXES | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | (Based on Use in Commerce) (Based on 44(e)) BABY BOOKS, PRESCHOOL LEVEL EDUCATIONAL BOOKS, AND LOG BOOKS;(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(e)) NOTEBOOKS, JOURNALS, DIARIES, ADDRESS BOOKS, TELEPHONE BOOKS, BIRTHDAY BOOKS;(Based on Intent to Use) CARDS, NAMELY, GIFT CARDS, GREETING CARDS, PHOTO ALBUMS, RECIPE CARDS, AND BOXES, NAMELY, CARDBOARD BOXES, CORRUGATED BOXES, PAPER BOXES, AND STATIONARY BOXES | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1992 |
| 020 | (Based on Intent to Use) PHOTO FRAMES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 26, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 24, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 25, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 1, 2003 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 18, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 31, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |