Drawing for SPRINT COMPASS

USPTO serial 78060891

SPRINT COMPASS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WILLIAMS, IRENE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPRINT COMPASS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David W. Matson

CHARLES J HYLAND SPRINTKSOPHN0314-3A6036450 SPRINT PKWYOVERLAND PARK, KS 66251

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Computer services; namely, comparing and evaluating computers systems of others and providing consultation services regarding the same.ACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 23, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 15, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 23, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Mar 27, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Oct 21, 2002EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Oct 15, 2002EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Apr 4, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 14, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 13, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance