USPTO serial 78061023
ACCELIO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLAYTON, CHERYL A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ACCELIO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lynn S. Cassan
LYNN S CASSAN CASSAN MACLEANSAME AS ABOVESTE 401 80 ABERDEEN STOTTAWA, ON K1S 5R5Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software applications for businesses in the area of workflow, operations and products integration and for the development and integration of computerized forms and computer software for the creation of business applications | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | business analysis, namely, business consulting providing a detailed analysis of existing computerized infrastructure and business operations; workflow planning services, namely, the development of a written analysis of business operations and the use and integration of software applications into existing computerized systems; application development services, namely the development of customized software to provide computerized tracking and reporting of business operations; form design services, namely, the development of customized electronic business forms and business form applications to meet the needs of business operations; integration services, namely, developing software for integrating customized software and computerized forms into exiting computerized systems, together with on-site installation; training services, namely, on-site training of users of installed software applications and computerized forms; on-line retail services for the sale of computer software and hardware; promoting the goods and services of others by placing advertisements and promotional displays in an electronic site accessed through computer networks; computer services, namely, creating indexes of information, sites and other resources available on computer networks; searching and retrieving information, sites, and other resources available on computer networks; providing on-line access to news, weather, sports, current events and reference materials; providing access to and dissemination of government, business and institutional forms of all types through global computer communications networks | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 3, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 16, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 29, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |