USPTO serial 78061038
SUPPORTING OUR SONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 28, 2003
- Examiner
- SHELLA, MELISSA
- Law office
- GENERIC WEB UPDATE
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SUPPORTING OUR SONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David O. Johanson, Esq.
David O. Johanson, Esq. BINGHAM MCCUTCHEN LLPONE FEDERAL STREETBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | EDUCATIONAL SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING COURSES OF INSTRUCTION IN THE FIELDS OF GENDER ISSUES AND PARENTING | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Supporting Our Sons, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Supporting Our Sons, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Supporting Our Sons, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named SUPPORTING OUR SONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2023 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2013 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 26, 2013 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 26, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2013 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2009 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 30, 2009 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 15, 2003 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| May 1, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 28, 2003 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 1, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 22, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 24, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |