Drawing for Serial No. 78061148

USPTO serial 78061148

Serial No. 78061148

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with Serial No. 78061148?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark I. Peroff

MARK I PEROFF KIRKPATRICK & LOCKHART LLP599 LEXINGTON AVENEW YORK, NY 10022UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Perfumes, cosmetics, semi-liquid and powder makeup, foundation, concealer, eye shadow, eye liner, mascara, lipstick, lip liner, lip glosses, rouge and blusher and carrying case thereof; soaps, shampoos, colognes, talcum powder, face creams, skin creams, face packs, skin lotions, lip creams, make-up base, skin cleansing preparations, face powder, bath powder, eyebrow pencils; nail care preparations, namely, nail color, nail polish removers and cuticle coats; bath salts, bubble baths and bath oils, not for medical purposes, shower gels; hair care preparations, namely, shampoos, rinse, conditioners, lotions, hair creams, hair dyes, sprays, gels and mousses; perfumery, deodorants, anti-perspirants, suntan and sun screening preparations, shaving preparations, toilet waters, eau de colognes, body sprays, massage oils and aromatherapy oils, mouthwashesACTIVE—
025Jackets, suits, trousers, socks, underwear, shirts, ties, coats, overcoats, rainwear, t-shirts, sport shirts, sweatshirts, scarves, cravats, jerseys, shorts, gloves, pullovers, cardigans, sweaters, waistcoats, belts, footwear and headwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 23, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 23, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 28, 2005CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 28, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Jun 16, 2005RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jun 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2004CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 4, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Oct 20, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 4, 2004UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 4, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 2, 2004CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Mar 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 27, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Feb 15, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 15, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 23, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance